Electronic billing, or electronic invoicing is the digital transmission of an invoice, typically a file, from a sender computer to a recipient computer. This can e.g. be a XML file by email, a PDF download from a web portal, but it can also be a computer fax between two computers.
Electronic invoices are not related to electronic payment, the recipient can still pay how (s)he likes, even in cash.
Structured vs unstructured
Unstructured invoices are human readable, for example the image file of a scanned paper invoice. PDF files may contain a text layer, but even this text does not define the precise meaning of the amounts are not defined in a machine readable way: both PDF files with and without text layers are unstructured: a software would have to guess the meaning of a particular amount or a user would have to at least manually approve according assignments.
A structured electronic invoice is usually a XML file. It defines data and meaning but it does not define a layout.
Structured electronic invoices are already obligatory for B2G invoices in some countries and will become also mandatory in Germany.
Hybrid vs native
Since the layout of a XML file is not defined, the recipient would have to define that e.g. the total amount is to be displayed at the bottom right of the document. There are many native formats and versions, UNCEFACT CII and UBL are just two examples and there is a very nice comparison between UBL and UN/CEFACT available.
Reading capability for structured invoices can be implemented in any software, which can then also check the calculation. But for semantical correctness, also native e-invoices usually have to be manually approved. And there is not yet a freely available cross platform offline reader software for UBL nor UN/CEFACT.
Hybrid e-invoices define both meaning and layout. Factur-X/ZUGFeRD define the invoice layout in a conventional PDF file, so you can use any PDF reader to access the invoice. The meaning (which amount is which tax amount and so forth), is additionally defined in a XML file which is embedded into the PDF file.
Since PDF readers are widely available, many recipients can use=pay the invoice manually “as usual”. The XML information will be used automatically if (s)he has a suitable specialized reader or ZUGFeRD capability integrated into her ERP system.
The FeRD published Guidelines for companies regarding electronic invoices. And E.ON Energie Deutschland GmbH produced a very basic (german) explanatory film on hybrid B2C e-invoices:
Pro hybrid invoices
- The reader software (PDF reader) is widely available.
- The sender does not have to know if the recipient is private, governmental or business customer and if a agreement has already been accepted.
- The invoice layout can be very close, if not identical, to printed invoices.
- The recipient and the sender can easily print hard copies.
- No fixed cutover date is necessary: due to the integrated fallback hybrid invoices can be introduced gradually.
- Invoice content and layout can be archived together.
- Service providers can digitalize a paper invoice and send the recognized invoice together with it’s raw image data.
- Additional files like time sheets or measurements can be included in the same invoice PDF file.
- The invoice can be digitally signed, which is still a requirement in some european countries like Hungary.
- Hybrid invoices (no prior agreement, wider availability of reader software) are more suitable for use in the B2C sector. (like e.g. used by EON or Conrad ) context.
Contra hybrid invoices
- Even if they are easily printable it is usually not sufficient to archive only a printed copy.
- Not only valid XML but also a valid carrier format like PDF-A is required.
- Only a few hybrid invoices will not save sufficient time to replace legacy workflows.
- People might continue to use the human readable part only.
- The decision if the machine or human readable part is used has to be documented in the process documentation in some countries, in Germany the XML part always has to be archived.
- There is usually little indication that a machine readable part exists.
- If the fallback is intact the sender might not even be notified if the machine readable
part is incomplete or corrupted.
- Hybrid invoices have a bigger filesize and require a layout, e.g. a letterhead.
- It is technically hard to automatically guarantee that the invoice layout (the human readable PDF “image”) matches the XML content. An attacker could send optically correct invoice PDFs with embedded counterfeit XML content. The attack will succeed if only the optical representation is checked, but the XML part is processed.
EN16931 buy from your national standard body consists of 16931-1 to 16931-5, the first two of which are published free of charge, EN16931-1 (german version) covers the calculation rules, EN16931-2 (german version) the eligible formats.
CEFDIGITAL has published a very helpful lists of all codes which can be used in EN16931 files, e.g. for currencies, countries, means of identification and units.
- Have magic scans (hybrid only)
- Some service providers scan paper invoices for their customers and deliver them as PDF. Since anyway already a optical character recognition (ORC) was run on the scans, they now also offer the service of semi-automatic invoice recognition and add manually corrected (and therefore guaranteed) ZUGFeRD metadata to their scans so that they can be automatically processed.
- Facilitate Procure-To-Pay (hybrid and native)
- When companies use ERP systems where
- orders are entered into the system and
- the storage facility registers every delivered item upon arrival in the system and
- the invoice arrives as ZUGFeRD and refers to the order
The invoice can be automatically checked vis á vis the order and can be automatically payed and booked as envisaged when creating the order.
- Have your suppliers in line (hybrid and native)
- Some bigger companies have managed to persuade a significant amount of their suppliers to send ZUGFeRD invoices. This way they save money because no paper or unstructured PDF invoices need to be processed.
- Pay invoice files (hybrid and native)
- ZUGFeRD means no more need to copy&paste IBAN, amount or purpose field for a bank transfer, it’s sufficient to select the ZUGFeRD-PDF file to be paid. This can e.g. be done with the open source onlinebanking software Hibiscus or a commercial product called CIB SEPArator which converts ZUGFeRD files to SEPA XML.
Some countries introduced mandatory electronic invoices in the B2G sector, Denmark was the first in 2005, followed by Sweden 2008, Spain and Finland 2010 and Austria and Italy 2014.
Probably also because already in 2009, Denmark could credibly explain that the e-invoice saves them 100 million Eur/year. The predicted savings vary in a great bandwidth, in 2010 the European Commission referred to a report
which indicates 226 billion Euro savings potential within six years (“assuming the best case scenario” and “a linear evolution”). In 2014, the EU finally decided in their 2014/55 EU Guideline to make the support of electronic invoices mandatory for all member states.
The EU legislation and Germany’s e-Rechnungsgesetz / e-Rechnungsverordnung define electronic invoices as structured, while the german law on VAT (Umsatzsteuergesetz) speaks of electronic invoices without further qualification and covers both structured and unstructured invoices. This unclear definition, often omitting the qualification “structured”, has caused some confusion, e.g. a german article stating that 68% of the participants in a survey do not know what electronic invoices are.
The European standardization authority CEN has published EN16931 to augment 2014/55/EU. From it’s five parts the first, EN16931-1, the list of qualified syntaxes and EN16931-2, the calculation rules, are available free of charge.
Switzerland followed with electronic invoices in 2016. Germany national authorities started accepting electronic invoices as of November 2018 and will make them compulsory as of November 2020 on a federal level as well as possible as of April 2021 on “subcentral” level (states, counties and cities).
Electronic invoicing is voluntarily in the B2B sector, with the exception of Italy, which introduced mandatory e-invoices on January 1st, 2019.
Apparently since then the according tax income has increased by an annual 3% due to the decrease of fraud. France would like to introduce mandatory B2B e-invoices between 2023-2025 and there is a (german) paper how the italian approach could also be applied on Germany.
In Austria, e-invoices are more or less treated like digital versions of the printed invoices, which makes it very easy to handle with. Austrian companies might even be allowed to destroy paper receipts after scans.
In Hungary, apparently e-invoices have to be digitally signed.
Regarding Switzerland, in 2018 Simone Sporing held a (german) speech “Die E-Rechnung in Industrie und Handel” how Coop introduced ZUGFeRD and that and how it was certified by the authorities
For further details on all European countries please refer to the “EU compendium on e-invoicing retention” which also lists the legal requirements for the different countries and the (german) collection on legal foundations for electronic invoices in the EU (Sammlung der Rechtsgrundlagen für elektronische Rechnungen in der EG).
As defined in the german e-invoice law (amended E-Rechnungsgesetz in Bgbl 19/2017) and the E-Rechnungsverordnung, structured e-invoices will become mandatory vis á vis the national authorities as of November 2020 in Germany and possible vis á vis federal authorities as of April 2021.
According to the justification for the e-Rechnungsverordnung the authorities receive an annual total of 7.95 million invoices, of which they expects 80% (6.36 million invoices) to become electronical.
The justification refers to the Architekturkonzept e-Rechnung, which estimates (page 96) 8 million invoices, half of which are direct and the other half are vis á vis the administration. Other sources talk about an expected 300,000 directly affected suppliers.
The official justification further expects a reduction of the processing time from 22,6 minutes to 11,78 minutes each and total savings of up to 62.38 million Euro for the government along with savings of 10.87 million Euro for the industry. The costs are expected to amount to 6.1 million Euro as a one off investment and 1.125 million Euro annually.
These 62.38 million is quite a lot but still much less than the 500 million expected in e.g. the Billentis E-invoicing business case, whichs says (page 21), “The difference to the total “public sector saving potential” above [in that case 6500-2600-3400] is the saving potential for the federal administration.”). The business cases also mentions a total “Minimum public sector saving potential” of 6.5 billion Euro per year just for Germany.
The german GOBD impose some obligations if you “save” an invoice in „the file-system“ – or if you accept (i.e. pay) structured or unstructured electronic invoices.
Among the most important duties is that both sender and recipient have to electronically archive the document (and potential embedded XML) in an unalterable way (“revisionssicher”), which requires (among others) tamper-free storage and a documentation of the process. BITKOMs has summarized the 10 most important requirements (german) and also published a exhaustive list of requirements vis á vis document management systems (in german).
On Youtube you will find a 20 minute german speech from 2016 on electronic invoices for SME.
In general, scanned paper invoices may be disposed, but only after certain criteria are met: e.g. it is defined who is responsible for that particular scan, the according person checked that its complete and legible, and the first digital backup has been created.
There is a (german) sample documentation on how to scan and how to file (also german). The DATEV has confirmed (in german) that digital files can be legally compliant.
In Germany there is no legal requirement to ask the recipient for permission to send her electronic invoices, if the invoice is accepted and paid, it means the the recipient also complies to the additional regulations. It is, however, her right to reject the electronic version and explicitly ask for a paper copy. In this case the paper original has to be provided.
- General topics
- Statistics and numbers
- IBI published a (german) Study in 2017, indicating 62% of all organisations send invoices by mail, 42% capture the data of electronic invoices but only 25% use this data. Around half of the organisations does not document their processes.
- The DIHK says 48% support the processing of electronic invoices
- The CEN released Schematron for UN/CEFACT CII SCRDM 16B
- The X-Rechnung Validator (is based on that schematron and also contains XRechnung sample files)
- FNFE’s validator is based on the Factur-X-Validator
- The validator of ZUGFeRD Community is based on ZUV
- The CEF also deploys a validator as linked
- Peppol practical has a validator which is based on an open source engine